How Fuel Costs, Geopolitics and Trade Shifts Are Reshaping Air Cargo
By ISTAT Staff, with reporting from Laura Mueller
01 June 2026
Geopolitical tensions, rising fuel costs and changing trade policies dominated discussion at the ISTAT Freighter Forum, where operators, lessors and logistics leaders gathered in Miami, Florida, from 16-17 April 2026 to assess the forces shaping the global cargo market.
Based on reporting from the forum by Laura Mueller of Airfinance Global, conversations pointed to an industry navigating growing uncertainty while continuing to adapt to shifting freight flows, evolving e-commerce dynamics and operational disruptions. While market pressures have intensified, many participants expressed confidence in cargo aviation’s ability to adjust.
Fuel Prices and Geopolitics Are Reshaping Cargo Economics
While supply chain constraints remain a long-term challenge for aviation, many discussions at the forum focused on a more immediate concern: fuel.
The ongoing conflict in the Middle East and resulting disruptions to energy markets have created renewed uncertainty for cargo operators already managing elevated operating costs. Speakers pointed to rising jet fuel prices, restricted airspace and longer routings as major disruptors to cargo economics in 2026.
Closed or heavily restricted airspace now accounts for a meaningful portion of the globe, forcing operators to reroute aircraft, increasing both flight times and operating costs. Those longer routings are also changing utilization patterns by reducing passenger belly cargo capacity while increasing demand for freighter aircraft.
Market data shared during the forum suggested global air cargo began the year on strong footing before softening amid geopolitical tensions. After year-over-year gains in January and February, cargo tonnage declined in March as higher costs and uncertainty weighed on the market.
At the same time, cargo yields increased as rates rose in response to tightening capacity and operational disruption.
Despite those pressures, panelists generally stopped short of predicting a prolonged downturn similar to earlier periods of cargo stagnation. Instead, many pointed to lessons learned during the pandemic and subsequent supply chain disruptions, arguing that the industry has become more capable of responding quickly to changing conditions.
The air cargo market has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to reroute capacity, adjust networks and redeploy aircraft in response to disruptions. Still, executives acknowledged that prolonged fuel volatility remains one of the sector’s greatest risks.
For many operators, the central question is not whether disruption will continue, but how long current pressures may last.
E-Commerce Remains the Growth Engine — Even as Trade Rules Shift
Even amid regulatory changes and shifting trade dynamics, delegates remained largely optimistic about the long-term role of e-commerce in supporting cargo demand.
Polling conducted during the forum found that most attendees still view e-commerce as the single biggest driver of future freight growth.
That optimism persists despite significant changes to de minimis exemptions in major markets.
The United States tightened rules governing low-value Chinese imports last year, contributing to a sharp decline in China-U.S. e-commerce air cargo volumes and prompting some shipments to shift from air freight to ocean transport. Beginning in July, the European Union will also eliminate its longstanding €150 de minimis duty exemption, requiring full customs clearance for imported goods.
Together, those policy changes represent one of the most significant adjustments to cross-border e-commerce logistics in years.
Rather than eliminating demand, however, forum participants described a market that is rapidly adapting.
As trade patterns evolve, aircraft are being redeployed to new routes and logistics providers are adjusting strategies to reflect changing economics. Europe, for example, has surpassed North America as the second-largest market for Chinese e-commerce air exports following recent U.S. policy changes.
The prevailing view throughout the forum was that trade tends to adapt rather than disappear. When one lane becomes less efficient, demand often shifts elsewhere.
At the same time, executives cautioned that the pace of change requires operators to remain nimble. Regulatory developments can alter trade flows quickly, and carriers able to respond fastest may be best positioned to benefit.
Even amid uncertainty, the broader outlook remained relatively steady: cargo demand may shift, but the movement of goods is unlikely to stop.
ISTAT members receive access to event presentations. View Tom Crabtree’s here or learn more about becoming a member.
Laura Mueller, director of aviation finance intelligence at Airfinance Global, helped with the reporting of this article.
All ISTAT ONLINE OFFERINGS